Jun07
Finding Color at the Zoo
When it comes to photography at zoos, I have mixed feelings. On the one hand, I do think zoos serve a purpose - educating people about animals, working to preserve endangered species, etc. But there is something vaguely disquieting in seeing some of these creatures literally behind bars. For me, at least.
That said, I go to the zoo here in Washington, D.C, often, armed with my Canon 30D and the longest lens I’ve got (a 70-200mm f/2.8 with image stabilization). The National Zoo, while it has its problems, is certainly among the best. And I could be wrong about this but I’ve always suspected the greater number of people visiting the zoo here are not out-of-towners flying in to see the various sites, but regular locals who just enjoy having a good day.
Either way, since the zoo does not charge an admission price (you can walk right in) it’s a pretty easy way to find fun for a day in Washington.
As a photographer, my attraction to the zoo may be different than what interests a true wildlife photographer. To begin with, although zoo animals are wild, they aren’t running wild. And for me, the mere fact of captivity changes things a bit.
When I visit the zoo I tend to seek out more abstract images in my photographs. The colors are spectacular. I’ve blogged before about the power of color and finding it in unusual places, and with these animals, it is no exception. The range of colors is just extraordinary.
I love the bird house for that reason. I took the photograph above of a bird - I swear it was a giant pidgeon - that perched on a handrail right near the exit from the birdhouse. Its feathers were simply stunning, and set against a white wall as it was it made an ideal opportunity. I tried easing myself closer, very slowly, but it did what most birds do when they see me - it took off flight! Women do that too when they see me. Go figure. But at least I got a shot I really like.
Now, being the first to critique my own images as I often am, I can tell you I think it would have been a better photograph if I’d had time to mount a flash - or even, I suppose, the *yikes* built-in flash. Something might have been better than nothing, since I think it would have really popped out the details in the feathers a bit more. But hey, this birdie wasn’t sticking around.
What draws me to more abstract photographs at the zoo, though, is the sense that I am not really trying to photograph animals “in the wild.” And since that’s the case, there’s no reason to make a shot of a creature look like it’s in the wild (hard to do, anyway). So I end up focusing in more closely on details in these beautiful creatures. The birds are an especially great thing to shoot. But so are the reptiles - snakes, lizards, etc. Even the small monkeys.
The National Zoo has a collection of Golden Lion Tamarins, small monkeys that, as you can guess, are strikingly beautiful shade of gold. The little guys don’t sit still for very long but they make great photographic subjects when they do.
But that’s the thing about a zoo. For me, captive animals can be photographed in ways that nature wouldn’t ordinarily allow. At least, not easily. And although, as I said, I have mixed feelings about seeing these beautiful creatures in captivity in the first place, the zoo experience can be a very rewarding one for a photographer.
You may be wondering how much tweaking I had to do in Photoshop with these two images and the answer is not very much. On MR. GIANT PIDGEON (okay I know that’s not its real name) I cropped slightly - just to remove the bird’s legs from the scene which were a distraction. I also had to whiten the background slightly, since the paint on the wall was a bit milky. But I did nothing to the bird itself beyond very standard color adjustment. Those were the bird’s real colors. Just incredible.
And my little golden monkey-friend? He was trickier. The image is slightly soft since I actually shot through glass. But the only adjustment I did on him was to slightly increase the reflectivity (the twinkle) in his eyes. The glass between us had reduced the twinkle in his eyes somewhat so my adjustment merely restored it to what I think it would have been.
In any case, if you have any zoo stories, tips or suggestions, please do share them by posting a comment.
Popularity: 26% [?]
If you enjoyed this post, be sure to subscribe to my RSS feed!



Bob! Jun 7th 2007 at 06:41 pm 1
The colours on the bird are stunning, although I’ve no idea what it is either. Pigeon sounds good enough for me
The monkey on the other hand is just beautiful and you’ve captured it really well. Might be worth a visit to Edinburgh zoo some time to see what’s there. Haven’t been there in years as I agree with you about the animals being in captivity.
Christopher Scholl Jun 7th 2007 at 06:57 pm 2
Thank you, Bob. That’s nice of you. And yes, by all means you should go to the zoo in Edinburgh. The fact is, despite the captivity issue, many zoos are doing a lot of good work these days in terms of working to protect endangered species, etc. If you do go - let me know. I’d love to see your pictures.
Meanwhile, I have some homework: to find out what that bizarre but beautiful bird really is!
Aaron Jun 7th 2007 at 09:10 pm 3
I really enjoyed the photo of that bird; a definite keeper! I spent a bit of time at the zoo near me, but didn’t make out quite as well as you did. Here is my own zoo story.
Christopher Scholl Jun 8th 2007 at 12:18 pm 4
Thanks Aaron. I checked out your zoo story and I think you did just fine! I wonder how you like that 100-400 lens? I looked at it and really loved its reach but was concerned about the f/4.5 minimum. Sounds like you ran into a bit of a challenge with it in that setting. But still, pretty cool to be able to shoot from that far away. Really helps with animals!
Aaron Jun 8th 2007 at 01:56 pm 5
Thanks, Chris. The 100-400 is fantastic. It’s true that the aperture is the limiting factor, but IS does make up for that to some degree. If you were to purchase one right now, it would be fitted with Canon’s second-generation IS, which they claim can give you three stops in some cases.
400mm definitely gets you there, though! It’s extremely handy for places (like the zoo) where you just can’t possibly get any closer physically. I also photographed surfers in Santa Cruz with it, and although it isn’t as nice as the 500mm (that the guy standing next to me had!), it’s pretty cost effective.
I plan to do an article on this, but shooting in RAW with the 5D produces a totally acceptable amount of noise, in my opinion, even up to ISO 3200, which pretty much negates any f/5.6 qualms.
Christopher Scholl Jun 8th 2007 at 03:25 pm 6
I bet! Isn’t technology cool??? I look forward to the article.
Colorful Peacock Jun 13th 2007 at 02:30 pm 7
[…] wrote about Finding Color at the Zoo. So what does a colorblind guy do with his camera handy and looking for some nice shots to take? […]
Dani Aug 14th 2007 at 07:31 pm 8
I’m a bit late in replying to this, but I have a great bit of zoo trickery that I just had to share.
On a recent trip to the Oregon Zoo, I was taking photos and was puzzled over exactly how to avoid the incredible glare off of most of the glass enclosures in the place. Luckily, I was armed with a friend and a long black jacket. With my friend standing behind me, jacket spread and blocking any light from hitting the glass, I was able to capture much better photos than otherwise (being dressed myself in black probably also helped!), and I was fairly pleased with my haul at the end of the day.
Christopher Scholl Aug 14th 2007 at 08:25 pm 9
Never too late. And that’s a great tip, Dani, thanks! Very cool idea.
Hmm… maybe I should go Goth!
By the way, there are tricks you can use in Photoshop to correct glare on glass after-the-fact. But it is ALWAYS better to do something right in the field rather than correct it later. So thanks for the great tip.
Chris