<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Finding Color at the Zoo</title>
	<link>http://photographersjourney.com/2007/06/07/finding-color-at-the-zoo/</link>
	<description>"In the name of God, stop a moment, cease your work, look around you." - Leo Tolstoy</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 09:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Scholl</title>
		<link>http://photographersjourney.com/2007/06/07/finding-color-at-the-zoo/#comment-362</link>
		<author>Christopher Scholl</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 00:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://photographersjourney.com/2007/06/07/finding-color-at-the-zoo/#comment-362</guid>
		<description>Never too late.  And that's a great tip, Dani, thanks!  Very cool idea.  

Hmm... maybe I should go Goth!  :-)

By the way, there are tricks you can use in Photoshop to correct glare on glass after-the-fact.  But it is ALWAYS better to do something right in the field rather than correct it later.  So thanks for the great tip.

Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never too late.  And that&#8217;s a great tip, Dani, thanks!  Very cool idea.  </p>
<p>Hmm&#8230; maybe I should go Goth!  <img src='http://photographersjourney.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
By the way, there are tricks you can use in Photoshop to correct glare on glass after-the-fact.  But it is ALWAYS better to do something right in the field rather than correct it later.  So thanks for the great tip.</p>
<p>Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dani</title>
		<link>http://photographersjourney.com/2007/06/07/finding-color-at-the-zoo/#comment-361</link>
		<author>Dani</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 23:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://photographersjourney.com/2007/06/07/finding-color-at-the-zoo/#comment-361</guid>
		<description>I'm a bit late in replying to this, but I have a great bit of zoo trickery that I just had to share.

On a recent trip to the Oregon Zoo, I was taking photos and was puzzled over exactly how to avoid the incredible glare off of most of the glass enclosures in the place. Luckily, I was armed with a friend and a long black jacket. With my friend standing behind me, jacket spread and blocking any light from hitting the glass, I was able to capture much better photos than otherwise (being dressed myself in black probably also helped!), and I was fairly pleased with my haul at the end of the day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a bit late in replying to this, but I have a great bit of zoo trickery that I just had to share.</p>
<p>On a recent trip to the Oregon Zoo, I was taking photos and was puzzled over exactly how to avoid the incredible glare off of most of the glass enclosures in the place. Luckily, I was armed with a friend and a long black jacket. With my friend standing behind me, jacket spread and blocking any light from hitting the glass, I was able to capture much better photos than otherwise (being dressed myself in black probably also helped!), and I was fairly pleased with my haul at the end of the day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colorful Peacock</title>
		<link>http://photographersjourney.com/2007/06/07/finding-color-at-the-zoo/#comment-243</link>
		<author>Colorful Peacock</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 18:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://photographersjourney.com/2007/06/07/finding-color-at-the-zoo/#comment-243</guid>
		<description>[...] wrote about Finding Color at the Zoo. So what does a colorblind guy do with his camera handy and looking for some nice shots to take? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] wrote about Finding Color at the Zoo. So what does a colorblind guy do with his camera handy and looking for some nice shots to take? [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Scholl</title>
		<link>http://photographersjourney.com/2007/06/07/finding-color-at-the-zoo/#comment-209</link>
		<author>Christopher Scholl</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 19:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://photographersjourney.com/2007/06/07/finding-color-at-the-zoo/#comment-209</guid>
		<description>I bet!  Isn't technology cool???  I look forward to the article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bet!  Isn&#8217;t technology cool???  I look forward to the article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://photographersjourney.com/2007/06/07/finding-color-at-the-zoo/#comment-206</link>
		<author>Aaron</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 17:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://photographersjourney.com/2007/06/07/finding-color-at-the-zoo/#comment-206</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Chris. The 100-400 is fantastic. It's true that the aperture is the limiting factor, but IS does make up for that to some degree. If you were to purchase one right now, it would be fitted with Canon's second-generation IS, which they claim can give you &lt;strong&gt;three&lt;/strong&gt; stops in some cases.

400mm definitely gets you there, though! It's extremely handy for places (like the zoo) where you just can't possibly get any closer physically. I also photographed surfers in Santa Cruz with it, and although it isn't as nice as the 500mm (that the guy standing next to me had!), it's pretty cost effective.

I plan to do an article on this, but shooting in RAW with the 5D produces a totally acceptable amount of noise, in my opinion, even up to ISO 3200, which pretty much negates any f/5.6 qualms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Chris. The 100-400 is fantastic. It&#8217;s true that the aperture is the limiting factor, but IS does make up for that to some degree. If you were to purchase one right now, it would be fitted with Canon&#8217;s second-generation IS, which they claim can give you <strong>three</strong> stops in some cases.</p>
<p>400mm definitely gets you there, though! It&#8217;s extremely handy for places (like the zoo) where you just can&#8217;t possibly get any closer physically. I also photographed surfers in Santa Cruz with it, and although it isn&#8217;t as nice as the 500mm (that the guy standing next to me had!), it&#8217;s pretty cost effective.</p>
<p>I plan to do an article on this, but shooting in RAW with the 5D produces a totally acceptable amount of noise, in my opinion, even up to ISO 3200, which pretty much negates any f/5.6 qualms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
